Interesting ad hominem affront. My proposition runs astray from your dictates and opinions and you reply to what? Not the message.

You ask for no barriers while suggesting the others do as you wish, stay put with their "chimeras", and hold back where the truths come calling. Interesting conflict Mitch.

Death to your people and their basic lives is death to all of us. Death to one is death to all.

Tread lightly around the moral high ground Mitch. And never assume you and the wonders that come with no barriers only resides where your self righteousness takes heed.

Survival is a strange sort of reality. This you seem to know well as you marry into the Western world and plot a life course within its world while suggesting in your reply to me that it by nature it is flawed, having no ground to kneel on as existences come to bear.

Your essay is about the nature of who is worse when both suffer flaws, tragic flaws. And then, ultimately love is the answer. Naturally, you took sides then ended by straddling the fence. And when called out, you attack the messenger. Sounds like one of your students.